My inclusion of Gabriel Josopovici on this
list comes down to two things: The
book ‘Contre-Jour’ (with it’s fantastic cover) on my shelf and his other book
about modernism. I’ve not read
either of them but what I make my judgment on is the quotes on the back and
it’s high praise indeed. It’s not
that his work is good that tips me off but it also the suggestion that he is
moving in an interesting fashion.
He is one who not only writes well but also has a vision. It strikes me that he purposeful writes
European literature and knowing how the committee can be euro-centric this may
be to his advantage.
There may not seem to be much to base a prediction on but I think that
in not reading Jospipovici’s books I can tell that he would be considered a
candidate. In this fashion he is a
bit like Aberto Manguel whom I know little. He’s a serious thinker of literature demonstrated in his
book about modernism asking what happened to it? So it is likely that he would bring that into his
books. Everything about
‘Contre-Jour’ screams high literature from the Pierre Bonnard painting to
Josipovici’s name. If he is, like
the Guardian says, ‘one of the very best writers now at work in the English
language’ than there is no reason why he cannot be a candidate for the Nobel
Prize.
No comments:
Post a Comment